Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:37:07 -0500 Reply-To: Bioinformatics List From: Lynda Ellis Subject: Symposium Evaluations Thanks to Alison Baerwald for summarizing the Symposium Evaluations. 35 of the 50+ symposium audience members returned an evalutation form. The responses were scored: 5 = Excellent, 4 = Very Good, 3 = Good, 2 = Fair, 1 = Poor. -------- -- ----- Item N Score -------- -- ----- Overall 32 4.3 Packets 33 4.0 Room 35 4.4 AV 33 4.3 Food 34 4.2 Schedule 34 4.1 Posters 31 3.4 Speakers 28 4.3 5 respondants had additional comments. "Excellent! Keep doing it next year." "Excellent blend of topics this year (I attended last year as well). Knowledge, interesting speakers, especially Dr. Arkin, Dr. Weishilboum and Dr. Wackett." "Richard W. must come back next year! Good food, snacks." "Prefer Sandwhiches made with bread, not croissants" "(room) Too cold during first talk. I would have appreciated a schedule."